Skip to main content

Health and territorial responsibility

Costa Rica

A team accountable for care in each area

2004 quasi-experimental study · 420 districts · 1985–2001

EBAIS

What the evidence shows

The 2004 study associated the reform with a relative reduction of 8% in child mortality and 2% in adult mortality. It used annual data from 420 districts between 1985 and 2001, with controls and fixed effects. Implementation was not randomised. [2]

Estimated relative reduction in mortality
Children
8%
Adults
2%

Reform estimates for 1985–2001, with controls and fixed effects. These are not percentage points or forecasts for Brazil. [2]

EBAIS are basic comprehensive health care teams. The territorial model links a population to a team, with prevention, treatment and referrals within the network. The reform began in 1995 and reached districts at different times. [1][2]

  1. Link each population to a team

  2. Prevent, treat and refer

  3. Track access and outcomes

Costs and delivery

The model requires permanent teams, data, facilities and a referral network. The sources consulted do not establish a full incremental cost or net savings caused by the reform for this profile. [1]

Limits of the comparison

The percentages are historical estimates for the reform, not forecasts for a Brazilian municipality or the isolated effect of each team. Unobserved differences and non-random adoption limit causal interpretation.

OpenGov3's interpretation

What it can teach Brazil

Who is accountable for access and continuity of care in each area?

What to monitor when adapting it

  • Coverage and inequalities between areas
  • Time to treatment and continuity of care
  • Mortality by group and comparable period
  • Full cost of teams and the network

These are criteria for analysis, not commitments already made or estimated outcomes for Brazil. A well-documented practice is not, by itself, causal proof of an entire country's success.

Sources consulted

Consulted on 10/29/2026. Each result retains its observed period; institutional descriptions and impact evaluations have different scopes.

  1. WHO Collaborating Centre — Comprehensive Primary Health Care Reform in Costa Rica (opens in a new tab)

    Description of EBAIS teams, assigned population and integrated care; separate from the mortality estimate.

  2. Rosero-Bixby — Evaluación del impacto de la reforma del sector de la salud en Costa Rica (2004) (opens in a new tab)

    2004 article, abstract: 420 districts, 1985–2001, mortality and non-random implementation.